Finance

US Trade Talks with China: A High-Stakes Game Begins in Geneva

2025-05-09

Author: Jia

The Scene is Set in Geneva

This week, US President Donald Trump hosted Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in a perplexing Oval Office meeting that went awry. Trump bewildered Carney, a seasoned economist, by labeling the US’s trade deficit with Canada a mere ‘subsidy.’ This baffling claim left onlookers, particularly Chinese officials preparing for trade discussions with the US, shaking their heads.

A Clash of Trade Titans

As negotiations kick off this Saturday in Geneva, Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng faces the daunting task of translating Trump's abstract economic views for the US representatives, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. He, an ally of President Xi Jinping with deep knowledge of China's economic framework, will be essential in these pivotal talks.

Potential Shifts in Tariffs

Reports indicate the US may consider lowering tariffs—currently a staggering 145%—to less than 60% to alleviate mounting tensions and economic strains on both nations. In the meantime, China’s tariffs on US goods stand at 125%. Not only might this move signal a thaw in relations, but the US is expected to pressure China to ease restrictions on rare earth minerals critical for several industries.

A Touch of Skepticism

While many analysts treat this weekend’s discussions as preliminary and less formal, they will closely observe how both sides set the stage for future negotiations. Leaders worldwide are also watching, particularly those who remember Trump’s erratic negotiation style. Past claims about signing numerous trade deals have turned into fodder for jokes, and many are cautiously optimistic about these latest rounds.

China's Assertiveness

China is determined to shift its economic strategy from reliance on exports to boosting domestic consumption. The challenge for He will be to convincingly present this transition as beneficial for the global economy, especially for American brands like Apple and Ford. However, Trump’s tariffs only hinder the purchasing potential of 1.4 billion Chinese consumers.

The Deflation Dilemma

China’s battle with deflation is also a crucial consideration. Trump’s tariff strategies could inadvertently plunge the world’s second-largest economy into a deflationary spiral, which analysts believe could create further complications for both nations.

Bargaining Power and Trust Issues

Beijing, with its significant US Treasury holdings, may wield this financial clout in negotiations. Concerns loom over how such moves could disrupt global markets, leaving Asian economies vulnerable. Meanwhile, trust issues are evident, as China has publicly rebutted Trump’s claims of negotiations—heightening skepticism among other nations looking to engage with the US.

The Stakes Are High

As Trump seeks a deal that might cushion his falling approval ratings due to tariffs, Xi's party enjoys stability without immediate electoral pressure. Trump has shown unpredictability, backtracking on various positions, which makes reaching a creative and cohesive agreement all the more critical.

China's Resilience

Interestingly, despite a significant decline in US exports, China's overall shipments saw an unexpected rise, highlighting their expanding influence in other markets. This resilience poses a challenge for US negotiations.

Economists Warn of a Broader Impact

China’s recent data releases indicate growing concerns over potential job losses due to US tariffs. Experts warn that millions of jobs could be jeopardized, affecting sectors heavily reliant on US exports. This market disruption extends its effects on emerging economies worldwide.

In Conclusion: The Comedy of Errors

Trump’s handling of trade negotiations, marked by puzzling statements and unexpected economic outcomes, suggests he may find himself outmaneuvered in Geneva. As the talks begin, all eyes will be on how both sides navigate through the complexity of modern trade relations, underscored by rising skepticism and global economic tensions.