Introduction

A concerned employer recently turned to the ‘MDW in Singapore’ Facebook group after observing alarming behavior from her domestic helper. With 1.5 years of service, the maid initially seemed to be a good fit for the family, especially in caring for their baby. However, a series of incidents has left the employer questioning her reliability and commitment.

Breach of Trust

While the family was away on holiday, the employer discovered through home surveillance cameras that the helper had left the house without permission on three different occasions, spending around two hours outside each time. This breach of trust raised immediate red flags for the concerned employer.

Disregarding House Rules

Moreover, the helper was found to be disregarding house rules consistently. Ignoring explicit instructions not to, she made personal online purchases delivered to the employer's home and invited a friend, also a maid, over without prior approval. These actions have left the family feeling uncomfortable and uncertain about the maid's judgment.

Communication Concerns

In addition to these infractions, the employer pointed out an unusual pattern: the helper had changed her phone number three times during her tenure. This raised further concerns about her transparency and communication.

Employer's Frustration

Despite their efforts to support her—inclusive of covering her medical expenses when she fell ill and facilitating the baby’s schooling to lighten her workload—the employer expressed frustration that the maid’s behavior did not reflect her gratitude or the promises she had made.

Seeking Advice

Seeking consensus, the employer shared her predicament with the community, asking for advice on whether to terminate the contract or give the helper another chance.

Community Reactions

Responses from the online community were divided. Many commenters urged the employer to act decisively, stating that the helper's frequent rule-breaking and erratic phone changes were clear indicators of deeper issues. One commenter emphatically stated, “This behavior is unacceptable; it’s a clear violation of trust. It’s better to send her back.”

Conversely, some defended the maid's actions, arguing that adults should have the freedom to go out when employers are away. They pointed out that it is not uncommon for people to change phone numbers for various reasons, suggesting that the employer shouldn’t jump to conclusions without first having a conversation with the helper.

“Don’t let assumptions cloud your judgment; have an open dialogue to uncover any valid reasons behind her actions,” advised one commenter.

Recommendations