As President Donald Trump approaches the milestone of 100 days in his second term, the atmosphere feels distinctly more chaotic than during his first presidency. His early days have been characterized by aggressive pushes to implement his policies, seemingly ignoring the foundational legal values of America.

In a recent interview with Time magazine, Trump shared his thoughts on the concept of a nation governed by laws rather than individuals. When asked about this principle, famously articulated by John Adams, Trump’s response raised eyebrows.

Time’s Eric Cortellessa and Sam Jacobs inquired about a new portrait of Adams that Trump had hung in the Oval Office. They quoted Adams’ assertion of being 'a government ruled by laws, not by men,' and asked the president whether he agreed.

Trump hesitated, stating, 'We’re a government ruled by law, but you know, somebody has to administer the law.' He expressed his belief that while laws are essential, the involvement of people—specifically, himself as an 'honest man'—is crucial. 'I wouldn’t agree with it 100 percent,' he added.

Despite his claimed aversion to exploiting legal loopholes, the irony wasn’t lost on critics, especially given his administration’s controversial interpretations of laws, particularly concerning immigration. Trump hinted at the existence of methods to pursue a potential third term, alluding to loopholes that, despite his stated opposition, suggest a willingness to bend rules.

When confronted about specific legal cases, such as that of Kilmar Abrego Garcia—a Maryland resident unjustly deported to El Salvador—Trump deflected responsibility, claiming that legal matters were out of his hands. He even refused to advocate for Garcia’s return, leaning on accusations that portrayed him as a gang member.

In a striking admission, Trump expressed interest in potentially deporting American citizens under extreme circumstances, stating, 'I would love to do that if it were permissible by law. We’re looking into that.' His willingness to explore such measures indicates a penchant for pushing boundaries.

As the nation watches, Trump's approach raises questions about the delicate balance between legal governance and the influence of powerful individuals. Indeed, while Adams emphasized the rule of law, it seems that one individual’s ambitions could reshape how these laws are applied.