World

Mysterious Feud or Foolish Vandalism? Accused in Iconic Tree Felling Claims He Was Framed!

2025-05-01

Author: Ting

Accused Claim They Were Set Up in Tree Controversy

In a shocking turn of events surrounding the infamous felling of the iconic Sycamore Gap tree, two men have made explosive claims during their trial. They allege that they were framed in the midst of a feud, raising questions about who is really to blame for this tragic act of vandalism.

The Legendary Tree's Demise

This beloved tree, standing proud for over a century along Hadrian's Wall in Northumberland, was tragically cut down during the early hours of September 28, 2023. The Durham Crown Court has described the act as a 'moronic mission,' echoing widespread outrage over the loss of such a significant landmark.

The Accusations Unfold

Daniel Michael Graham, 39, from Carlisle, and Adam Carruthers, 32, from Wigton, both categorically deny charges of criminal damage related to the infamous tree and the surrounding Roman Wall. During police interviews, the men maintained that they lacked the necessary skills to fell such a large tree, with Carruthers admitting he had no chainsaw training whatsoever.

Video Evidence Paints a Damning Picture

Despite their denials, jurors heard that the tree's destruction was filmed on Graham's phone, and both men reportedly removed a piece of the trunk as a 'trophy.' A forensic botanist testified there was compelling evidence that this wood came from the Sycamore Gap tree.

Claims of a Setup Surface

Graham insisted that he was an innocent bystander caught up in a vendetta, claiming that he was unfairly pegged as a suspect due to a feud with rivals. Audiences learned he was 'proper raging' over the situation, expressing deep concern that the accusations could destroy his life and business.

Dramatic Revelations in Court

The courtroom drama intensified as Graham initially maintained his innocence, stating he was merely curious about the aftermath of the incident. When pressed on video footage linking him to the crime, he chose to say 'no comment' repeatedly. His insistence that the sound of the chainsaw in the video didn’t match any he owned added another layer of complexity to the case.

Carruthers’ Defense: A Man Exhausted

Equally adamant about his innocence was Carruthers, who described himself as 'exhausted' after his partner recently gave birth, claiming he couldn’t recall his actions at the time of the felling. He acknowledged having experience with chainsaws but maintained they were 'nasty things' he would prefer to avoid.

What's Next for the Accused?

As the trial unfolds, many are left wondering if this is merely a case of childish pranks gone wrong or a serious crime that speaks to deeper community issues. The story continues to develop, and the world watches closely to see the fate of these accused tree fellers.