Last Friday, while Shedeur Sanders found himself slipping down the draft board, we posed a bold question: could returning to college for another year be a smarter move? This intriguing debate quickly became the most-read story in the 23.5-year history of PFT!

Despite his drop to a spot guaranteeing him around $4.5 million over four years, Sanders appears ready to embrace his chance in the NFL. However, whispers suggest he entertained the idea of returning to college before his unexpected fall ended.

In an interesting twist, antitrust expert Jeffrey Kessler had shown interest in exploring a challenge against NCAA regulations that theoretically restrict players like Sanders from returning to college.

The key questions loom large: Will NCAA rules change soon? If players don’t sign professional contracts, shouldn't they have the freedom to change their minds? While the NFL may not favor it, the real issue centers around when and how a player’s path in college football is permanently closed.

Imagine if Sanders had opted to stay in college this year — he might have banked more than what the Browns will pay him over four years! A stellar season could have bolstered his draft status, especially if he transferred to another prominent school, perhaps North Carolina, to prove his talent outside his father's shadow.

Moreover, a fresh start in 2026 might have paved the way for an even higher draft spot and a lucrative rookie deal, as he could reframe his approach entirely.

As it stands, Sanders is poised to compete for a starting position among a crowded field in Cleveland. Yet, the broader issue is far from settled. The NCAA's restrictive rules on post-draft decisions are under scrutiny, and all it takes is someone bold enough to challenge this norm!