In a surprising turn of events, the Ontario Liberal caucus has boldly declared that there was no internal revolt against their leader, Bonnie Crombie, insisting it was entirely her decision to step down.

In an official statement released to The Globe and Mail, Liberal MPP Stephanie Smyth emphasized the caucus's appreciation for Crombie's dedication in revitalizing the party. "We express our deepest gratitude to Bonnie Crombie for all she did to transform the Ontario Liberal Party into what it is today. Her relentless drive for success is commendable," the statement read, representing the sentiments of all 14 MPPs.

Crombie's resignation announcement, made on Sunday, has sent ripples through the party. She will step down after a leadership contest following a disappointing assessment of her leadership tenure.

A Torn Decision After a Narrow Vote!

Just hours before her resignation, the Ontario Liberals voted narrowly against holding a leadership contest. The vote showed 57% favoring the status quo, with only 43% in support of a leadership change. Despite clearing the necessary threshold to remain leader, many party insiders claimed Crombie needed a decisive two-thirds majority to assure confidence.

Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, who previously challenged Crombie during the last leadership bid, was among those advocating for a clearer mandate. The push for change was further fueled by a faction known as the New Leaf Liberals.

Crombie's Turbulent Journey!

Crombie's exit follows her failed attempt to secure a seat in the recent election, adding to the complications surrounding her leadership. Earlier discussions with her caucus had bolstered her assurance of support, yet she faced the stage alone when the results were revealed.

"While I didn’t get the number of votes I hoped for, I believe a leadership contest less than two years after I took the helm would cause more harm than good," Crombie remarked post-announcement, signaling her focus on party stability.

Public affairs consultant Marcel Wieder weighed in, suggesting that had Crombie secured a seat, the dynamics could have been different: "If you lack the caucus's backing and face an internal revolt, the situation escalates significantly."