Entertainment

Justine Bateman Critiques Harry and Meghan’s “Victim Olympics” Strategy

2025-03-17

Author: Liam

Introduction

Justine Bateman, best known for her role in the hit TV show “Family Ties,” has unleashed a scathing critique of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, accusing them of turning victimhood into what she calls a "Victim Olympics." In a compelling post on Substack titled, “The Problem With Meghan Markle: It’s Not What She’s Doing, It’s the Victim Olympics Road She Took to Get There,” Bateman expresses her views on the couple's approach since stepping down from their royal duties.

Bateman's Argument

The 59-year-old actress argues that every opportunity the Sussexes have pursued seems tied to a narrative of victimhood, stating that it differs significantly when viewed in the context of their current situation versus two years ago. “It’s 2025, and no one wants to see victims anymore,” she asserts. Critics and supporters alike may be curious to know: has public sentiment truly shifted so drastically?

Claims and Timing

Bateman points out specific claims made by the couple about their treatment within the royal family—including allegations regarding discussions about their son’s skin color and a lack of protection from hostile media narratives. She highlights how their timing coincided perfectly with a societal “Victim Olympics Era” spanning 2020 to 2024, where victim narratives gained traction, allowing them to secure lucrative deals.

Financial Gains

In her post, Bateman takes a jab at their financial gain, listing their multi-million dollar contracts, including a $100 million deal with Netflix and significant book and podcast agreements. She argues these achievements are less about their individual talents and more about the dialogue they’ve perpetuated around their alleged mistreatment.

Call for Change

However, Bateman warns that now is the time for Harry and Meghan to prove themselves in a new era where incessant victimhood is no longer appealing. “People are tired of observing a couple who built their careers on disdain for the Royal Family yet are reluctant to let go of their royal titles,” she states.

Potential Beyond Victimhood

As Bateman rounds up her thoughts, she expresses a belief that both Harry and Meghan possess untapped potential that is overshadowed by their current fixation on victimhood. She encourages them to step back, reflect, and discover their true selves, suggesting that it could lead to a more positive public perception.

Broader Context

In the broader context, discussions surrounding the Sussexes and their choices continue to provoke strong opinions across the media landscape, polarizing audiences and sparking intense debates on activism and celebrity culture. While their representatives have yet to comment on Bateman’s latest critique, it’s clear that their narrative is far from settled in the public forum.

Conclusion

This ongoing saga raises questions about the intersection of celebrity and activism—what does it mean to engage with social issues when public perception is hanging delicately in the balance? Only time will tell how Harry and Meghan choose to navigate their future endeavors.