
Alaska Senator Issues Bold Threat: Will Cruise Ships Skip British Columbia?
2025-03-14
Author: William
Alaska Senator Issues Bold Threat
In a surprising escalation of trade tensions, Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan has announced plans to pursue legal avenues to block cruise ships from docking at British Columbia ports. This ultimatum arises in response to British Columbia Premier David Eby’s recent decision to impose new fees on commercial trucks traveling from Washington State to Alaska, a move seen as a direct retaliation against the United States amid ongoing trade hostilities.
Sullivan has made it clear that if he cannot pass legislation, he will consider pressing for an executive order to achieve his goal. During an interview with a local radio station, he stated, “Two can play this game. Canada, you don’t want to mess with Alaska. If you do, we’re going to work hard on having our cruise ships bypass your ports, and that’ll help our economy tremendously.”
The senator believes that cutting cruise visits to B.C. will significantly bolster Alaska’s tourism sector while severely impacting British Columbia's economy. “It’ll pull billions of dollars of tourism revenue from western Canadian provinces,” he warned.
Historical Context and Previous Incidents
Historically, the last instance of cruise ship diversions from B.C. occurred during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. At that time, Sullivan sought support from Canadian leaders for waivers that would allow U.S. cruise ships to dock in Vancouver. However, those requests were dismissed, which Sullivan recalls with frustration, highlighting how Canada lost hundreds of millions in revenue as a consequence.
Legal Framework and Implications
Sullivan’s strategy revolves around the Passenger Vessel Services Act (PVSA), a law from 1886 that prohibits American cruise ships from transport between U.S. ports unless they stop at a foreign port, such as those in British Columbia. This longstanding legislation is often discussed alongside The Jones Act, which similarly governs cargo transport.
Responses from Affected Parties
Responses from Canadian ports have indicated concern over Sullivan's threats. The Port of Vancouver, a major terminal for Alaskan cruises, emphasized its critical role as a homeport for such vessels. “Vancouver has been a premier homeport for Alaskan cruises for almost 40 years,” their statement read, noting that disruption to this relationship could have lasting implications for tourism and economy in both regions.
The Greater Victoria Harbour Authority echoed these sentiments, stressing the interconnectedness of the Alaskan cruise industry with the Pacific Northwest. They are closely watching the evolving political landscape and remain committed to welcoming a significant number of vessels to Victoria in the coming years.
The B.C. Ministry of Transportation reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining positive relations with Alaska. They clarified that the new legislation does not impose immediate fees on Alaska-bound trucks but serves as a safeguard, signaling that British Columbia may act if U.S. tariffs continue to escalate.
Current Industry Outlook
The local cruise ship season, which commenced earlier this month, is set to welcome over 300 ships, bringing approximately 1.2 million passengers. This robust industry not only creates thousands of jobs in British Columbia but also injects billions of dollars into the local and national economies.
As the political tension simmers, the hope remains that diplomatic measures will prevail and that the critical tourism link between Alaska and British Columbia can continue without further interruptions.